Posts Tagged ‘ Home Loan Lending ’

Do I Need To Sell My Home Before I Can Qualify For A New Mortgage On Another Property?

Although every situation is unique, it is still possible to qualify to purchase a new home while keeping your current primary residence in Phoenix.

Perhaps you are outgrowing your current house, or have been forced to relocate due to a job transfer?  Regardless of the motivation for keeping one property while purchasing another, let’s address this question with the home mortgage approval in mind…

So, Do I Have To Sell?

Yes.  No.  Maybe.  It depends.

Today’s mortgage guidelines are based on the past few years of rising defaults and risky lending practices.  So one simple question can no longer be answered with one simple answer…and all of them may be right.  If you are in a financial position where you qualify to afford both your current residence and the proposed payment on your new house, then the simple answer is Yes

Qualifying based on your Debt-to-Income Ratio is one thing, but remember to budget for the additional expenses of maintaining multiple properties.  Everything from mortgage payments, increased property taxes and hazard insurance to unexpected repairs should be factored into your final decision. 

What If I Rent My Current Property?

This scenario presents the “maybe” and the “it depends” answers to the question.  If you’re not quite qualified to carry both mortgages, you may have to rent the other property in order to offset the mortgage payment.  In that scenario, the lender will typically only count 75% of the monthly rent you are proposing to receive.  So if you are going to receive $1000 a month in rent and your current payment is $1500, the lender will factor in an additional $750 of monthly liabilities in your overall Debt-to-Income Ratios. 

Another detail that can present a huge hurdle is the reserve requirements and equity ratios guidelines which most lenders have in place.  In some cases, if you are going to rent out your current home, you will need to have at least 30% equity in order to offset your payment with the proposed rent you will receive.  Without a sufficient amount of equity, you will have to qualify to afford BOTH mortgage payments.  You should also plan on showing some significant cash in the bank.  Generally, lenders will require six months reserves on the old property, as well as six month reserves on the new property.

For example, if you have a $1500 payment on your old house and are buying a home with a $2000 monthly payment, you will need over $21,000 in the bank.  Keep in mind, this reserve requirement is incremental to your down payment on the new property.

What If I Can’t Qualify Based On Both Mortgage Payments?

This answer is pretty straightforward, and doesn’t require a financial calculator to figure out.  If you are in this situation, then you will have to sell your current home before buying a new one.  If you aren’t sure of the value of the home or how your local market is performing, please contact me and I’ll refer you to a great real estate agent that can assess values in your neighborhood.

As you can tell, purchasing one home while living in another can be a very complicated transaction.  Please feel free to contact me anytime so we can review your specific situation and suggest the proper action.

Hurdles of Home Lending

So I picked up the Wall Street Journal recently and read some snips and bits of an article about a guy finding out the pitfalls of today’s lending environment.  Mr. Davis has a nearly perfect credit score, equity in his home, considerable savings and a solid pension plan.  But he recently found out that his lender didn’t want to refinance his mortgage.  The problem?

Mr. Davis’s income-tax return showed he had taken a loss on an investment he made in a small, family-owned business. That was enough to raise doubts about his otherwise strong financial condition.

Three years after the onset of the mortgage crisis, lenders are continuing to tighten credit standards.  The initial moves were a natural reaction for a business badly burned by rising delinquencies and defaults.  But conditions are now so tight that lenders are frustrating borrowers who have enviable financial situations but still can’t easily satisfy lenders’ rigid checklists.

This one guy…we’ll call him a Wells Fargo rep (wink wink…’cause he is one) was quoted as saying, “The pendulum may have swung too far the other way.”  Really?  Tell us something we don’t know Mr. Economist.  Jeez…we’ve got Government agencies saying they will do one thing (guidelines) and all the lenders overlaying those policies and guidelines with their own filtration system…sometimes flushing the otherwise clean paper down the toilet.  Risk “tolerance” ended long ago in the lending world.  Underwriter’s fear for their jobs because of the enormous responsibility they have to their responsible party, which is the end investor who is buying the paper from the originating mortgage company (typically referred to as the servicer of the mortgage).  CYA is happening everywhere in this industry.   

Some analysts thought that by this point in the business cycle, lenders would have started to relax credit conditions slightly after clamping down on the risky bubble-era practices.  Instead, the screws are still tightening.  This is partly because lenders are taking every precaution to avoid being forced to buy back loans from mortgage investors Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in the event of default.  If you didn’t know, when a borrower defaults…Fannie and Freddie typically buy the loan out of the mortgage-security pool and pursue a workout or foreclosure.  But they can force lenders to repurchase loans when they find flaws in the way they were underwritten.  Hence, the underwriter is scared.  Repurchases were a minor nuisance when defaults were low but have escalated over the past year.

Fannie and Freddie have already tightened their standards:  Borrowers with credit scores above 720 accounted for 85% of all loans purchased by Fannie and Freddie last year.  But some banks are being even more stringent to prevent repurchases and want several years of pay stubs, tax returns and other paperwork from potential borrowers.

The Wall Street Journal reports that during the first quarter of this year, Freddie kicked $1.3 billion in loans back to lenders, up from $800 million during the year-earlier period.  At Fannie, repurchase requests jumped to $1.8 billion from $1.1 billion one year earlier.  To be sure, the government has taken steps to keep mortgage spigots open.  FHA still allows down payments as low as 3.5%.

Borrowers who have received standard paychecks and have uncomplicated finances generally aren’t getting tripped up.  But others face hurdles, such as self-employed borrowers, for example.  They document their incomes with tax returns that include business-related write-offs, which might (almost always) understate their cash flow.

Such caution in lending right now is helping to hold down lending completely, despite the lowest interest rates in more than five decades.  Remember Mr. Davis?  He thought he was exactly the kind of customer lenders love.  He hoped to lower his interest rate to less than 5% from the current 6% through a refinance.  But his mortgage broker turned down the application, citing the investment-related loss, which Mr. Davis saw as a minor setback rather than a threat to his financial health.  Rather than continuing to shop around for a refinancing, Mr. Davis decided to cash in some of his investments and pay off the mortgage.

People with complicated financial situations can still find some willing lenders, but it takes more persistence than most people want to put forth.  Heck, don’t make me tell you the story I heard recently of an arranged refinance for a borrower with a very high credit score and lots of home equity and debt payments totaling just 19% of pretax income.  The lender was worried about this client’s credit report showing a $14 missed payment to a credit-card company in 2001.  The lender insisted on proof the money had been paid, which was impossible to get.  That creditor long disappeared and was out of business anyhow!  Who cares?  Right?  I mean, we’re talking nine years ago and it’s $14!  This borrower appeased the lender by writing a $14 check, though no one knew where to send it.

I have a client who is a rookie in the NFL and has a contract in black/white paying him close to seven figures.  He and his wife want to purchase a home at the price of $279,000.  He has an above 800 credit score and all other parameters are impeccable.  The underwriter/bank balked because he was recently put on IR for his team and wouldn’t be on the active 40-man roster at the start of the season.  When I got the player’s agent involved to uncover the way contracts are paid when a player is on IR (paid in full by the way) and went back to the underwriter/bank, you know what they said?  “Once Player X comes off of the IR, who knows if the team will cut him or not, so we are not willing to take the risk.”  Unbelievable.

As companies go out of business and the workforce shrinks…and there are job gaps in employment with potential buyers and borrowers…we’re going to see an awful lot of people whose business disappeared unless the banks learn some flexibility.

Until then though…have your blood and urine samples at the ready!